| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Pendent party jurisdiction ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Pendent party jurisdiction
In the United States federal courts, pendent party jurisdiction refers to a court's power to adjudicate a claim against a party who would otherwise not be subject to the jurisdiction of the federal courts, because the claim arose from a common nucleus of operative fact.〔Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed. 1999.〕〔Chemerinsky, Erwin. Federal Jurisdiction, 4th Edition, § 5.4 (pp. 338-339) Aspen Publishers, 2003. ISBN 0-7355-2718-0.〕
One well-known example of this is when a federal court adjudicates a state law claim asserted against a third party which is part of a case brought to it under its federal question jurisdiction. This was the situation in ''Finley v. United States'', , in which the Supreme Court found that a grant of jurisdiction over a claim involving certain parties did not extend to additional claims involving different parties.〔Finley v. United States, 490 U.S. 545, 556 (1989).〕 ''Finley'' was superseded by ''Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services'', 545 U.S. 546, in which the Supreme Court noted that Congress overturned the result in ''Finley'' by enacting 28 U.S.C. § 1367.〔''Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services'', 545 U.S. 546, 558 (2005).〕
Pendent party jurisdiction is a form of supplemental jurisdiction covered by . Subsection (b) prohibits parties from being joined in a federal case brought under the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts (where diversity is the sole basis of federal court jurisdiction), if joining such parties would eliminate complete diversity.〔See ''Strawbridge v. Curtiss'', 7 U.S. 267 (1806), for an explanation of the "complete diversity" rule.〕
==References==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Pendent party jurisdiction」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|